<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Call of Duty: World at War &#8211; Nothing More than a CoD4 Mod</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/call-of-duty-world-at-war-nothing-more-than-a-cod4-mod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/call-of-duty-world-at-war-nothing-more-than-a-cod4-mod/</link>
	<description>software and hardware editorials from pc gamers</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:50:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Goneval</title>
		<link>http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/call-of-duty-world-at-war-nothing-more-than-a-cod4-mod/#comment-54</link>
		<dc:creator>Goneval</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:14:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-54</guid>
		<description>I am pretty sure he is ironic!

The video looked really cool and realistic. Cod 5 looks good ^^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am pretty sure he is ironic!</p>
<p>The video looked really cool and realistic. Cod 5 looks good ^^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: xponex</title>
		<link>http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/call-of-duty-world-at-war-nothing-more-than-a-cod4-mod/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>xponex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 21:06:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Pat Mac, I played cod4 at a very high competitive level and have been sponsored by organizations before and sent to LANs to compete with my hotel and air fair payed in full.  The Nvision LAN was a VERY big tournament which featured CoD4 as an event.  Obviously there are other players like myself who compete at a high skill level and I am friends with most of them.  I personally have met the players who were asked to try out CoD5  and have played and competed against them throughout the majority of CoD4.  I play on the PC btw, so I don&#039;t play nooby games such as Halo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pat Mac, I played cod4 at a very high competitive level and have been sponsored by organizations before and sent to LANs to compete with my hotel and air fair payed in full.  The Nvision LAN was a VERY big tournament which featured CoD4 as an event.  Obviously there are other players like myself who compete at a high skill level and I am friends with most of them.  I personally have met the players who were asked to try out CoD5  and have played and competed against them throughout the majority of CoD4.  I play on the PC btw, so I don&#8217;t play nooby games such as Halo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blaz</title>
		<link>http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/call-of-duty-world-at-war-nothing-more-than-a-cod4-mod/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Blaz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2008 13:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Look hes Right, im playing the beta every day with my clan its just not worth paying $50 for the guns have bad reg the rifles don&#039;t 1 shot unless you play hardcore or on a server with max health lowered, the Tommy doesn&#039;t need zoom to be accurate just no scope and kill, The Grenades have low damage, its just COD4 with good maps, Bad guns, and not to mention the Bad sound, People walking around like they got chains on there body, i played cod4 at high skill level and now on cod5 im killing alot of people in wars but its just a shit Game COD4 is better</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Look hes Right, im playing the beta every day with my clan its just not worth paying $50 for the guns have bad reg the rifles don&#8217;t 1 shot unless you play hardcore or on a server with max health lowered, the Tommy doesn&#8217;t need zoom to be accurate just no scope and kill, The Grenades have low damage, its just COD4 with good maps, Bad guns, and not to mention the Bad sound, People walking around like they got chains on there body, i played cod4 at high skill level and now on cod5 im killing alot of people in wars but its just a shit Game COD4 is better</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/call-of-duty-world-at-war-nothing-more-than-a-cod4-mod/#comment-8</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Oct 2008 20:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-8</guid>
		<description>Well from what I have seen I agree- COD5 looks exactly like a COD4 mod. the gameplay identical, the graphics, the mechanics. upgradable weapons- scopes, silencers etc plus all the usual perks are there plus a few more. the recon plane= radar, artillery strike= reminscent of the airstrike &amp; AI attack dogs replace the helicopter gunship. World at War will however include tanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well from what I have seen I agree- COD5 looks exactly like a COD4 mod. the gameplay identical, the graphics, the mechanics. upgradable weapons- scopes, silencers etc plus all the usual perks are there plus a few more. the recon plane= radar, artillery strike= reminscent of the airstrike &amp; AI attack dogs replace the helicopter gunship. World at War will however include tanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jamie</title>
		<link>http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/call-of-duty-world-at-war-nothing-more-than-a-cod4-mod/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Jamie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 12 Oct 2008 16:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-6</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re an idiot. &quot;It looks the same as CoD4!&quot;
Well no shit! Mr Sherlock, the game is using CoD4&#039;s engine to make it better. You expect them to create there own engine? Obvcourse not, then it would be completely different to anything like CoD.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re an idiot. &#8220;It looks the same as CoD4!&#8221;<br />
Well no shit! Mr Sherlock, the game is using CoD4&#8217;s engine to make it better. You expect them to create there own engine? Obvcourse not, then it would be completely different to anything like CoD.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mister</title>
		<link>http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/2008/09/11/call-of-duty-world-at-war-nothing-more-than-a-cod4-mod/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 06:30:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pcgametech.wordpress.com/?p=16#comment-5</guid>
		<description>You are an idiot. All of your &quot;confirmed&quot; information is all wrong. That Perk list has since been proven it was fake. The person who posted it claiming he had access to MP at the nVision event was full of it, Treyarch even said they only broguht their SP builds of the game. If you didnt like CoD4 then you probably wont like CoD5 but isnt the idea of a sequel to build off its previous, and not complete throw out and change everything? Youre a joke.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are an idiot. All of your &#8220;confirmed&#8221; information is all wrong. That Perk list has since been proven it was fake. The person who posted it claiming he had access to MP at the nVision event was full of it, Treyarch even said they only broguht their SP builds of the game. If you didnt like CoD4 then you probably wont like CoD5 but isnt the idea of a sequel to build off its previous, and not complete throw out and change everything? Youre a joke.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
